Police: Uncle Bit Boy to Teach a Lesson
Thursday, May 17, 2007
BRIDGEPORT, Conn. - A man was charged with assault for allegedly biting his 3-year-old nephew all over his body to teach the toddler that biting people is wrong, police said.
Hector Pulido, 40, was arrested Tuesday after day care workers discovered adult-size bite marks on the boy's chest, stomach, shoulder, back, thigh, leg and buttocks, police said.
The boy told officers his uncle had bitten him. When questioned, Pulido allegedly admitted that he did it "to teach him not to bite anyone," said Lt. James Viadero, a police spokesman.
Pulido was charged with assault and risk of injury to a minor. He was being held on $100,000 bond after a court appearance Wednesday. A message seeking comment was left with the public defender representing Pulido.
The toddler was evaluated at a hospital, and the state Department of Children and Families was notified.
Penelope Leach, child psychologist writing for babycenter. The italics are mine.
It's understandable to despair when your child sinks his teeth into your — or even worse, another person's — flesh, and the "bite him back" argument may seem like a logical way to stop his biting. Nevertheless, it's wrongheaded.
Teeth (and "claws") are natural weapons for all young mammals, so your child's first instinct is to use them when he feels threatened or needs something. He doesn't truly understand that biting (and pinching and pulling hair) is forbidden, let alone "wrong." So when he bites, even if he does it gently and playfully, immediately and clearly convey to him that biting isn't acceptable.
If his "kisses" turn into aggressive nibbles, for instance, remove him from your lap with a firm "no biting." He's still too young for lengthy explanations about why biting is bad; it's enough at this point to simply tell him that he must not bite under any circumstances.
Make sure, too, that you don't inadvertently reward your child for biting. Of course, teeth marks will get your attention, but don't pick him up — even if it's to reprimand him. If your child bites another child, focus your attention on the injured party rather than on the biter — who may take even negative attention as reinforcement for doing it again.
While you need to firmly tell your child that biting isn't okay, actually punishing him for the behavior isn't very effective at getting him to stop. In fact, punitive measures may put an angry or overstimulated child right over the top. And though parents are often counseled to bite their child back "to show him how it feels," this is as pointless as it is painful.
A child this age isn't capable of truly putting himself in another's shoes, so he can't yet see the connection between what he does and what's done to him. What's more, young children do most of their social learning by following their parents' example, so biting your child or otherwise inflicting pain on him sets an appallingly bad example. After all, how will he learn that biting is beyond the pale if you do it, too?
Biting must be stopped, of course, but you won't stop it by stooping to your child's level. Aggressive acts stop when adults stop them. So instantly remove your child's teeth from his victim's flesh, show concern for the child who's been hurt, acknowledge both parties' feelings, and, as your child's verbal skills grow, help him learn to negotiate with words rather than aggression: "We don't bite (or hit or grab). Can you use your words to tell me what you
need?"
7 comments:
I have to say that I am a no biter. It doesn't make sense to me that you bite a child to teach him NOT to. Backwards logic. However, I do have to say, I know of at least one child who would not give up on biting. (Thankfully, both of mine have been great about not biting.) But, I know that the mom finally gave in and bit the child. Not to hurt the child, nor out of a lack of control, but simply because at the age the child was, he needed to know that biting hurt other people. After that experience the child never bit again. I'm not advocating biting--but know that in many instances parents are just doing the best they can and if they get to the point of physical punishment, it's often because they don't know what to do next. BTW--the biting incident was out-of-character for this child and he grew up to be a very loving, trusting child.
Not knowing what to do next is not a reason to hurt a child. Why punish the child for your own lack of handling a situation? If you don't know what to do next, you should leave the situation. Prayer, love, time. All of these are much better choices.
I can't believe that this is an issue. And I don't know what day care instructor would recommend it unless it's the Jeffery Dahmer daycare center.
I would have to say...in all my studies on child play therapy and theraplay and the parenting courses I've taught, I haven't ever seen any literature that gave that option of biting your child as a viable form of discipline.
I agree with Amanda, it's backwards logic.
Great post my love.
Here is my take on all physical punishment: If you hurt your child on purpose, you are teaching them that it's okay for the people who love them to inflict pain on them. Is that lession really worth it? What will you say when their future sweetheart does that? You already spent their formative years teaching them that when they do something wrong they deserve to be hurt by their loved ones.
Here is what the wisdom of the years has taught me (can you hear the fake-snobbery in my voice?)--people can and will do things. and I whole-heartedly agree with little of it.
So. have you read any good books lately?
The effectiveness of a technique does not justify it. Pain controls things, but it doesn't teach things. Ever.
I really like the article you posted about alternatives.
I didn't even know people did that. I could never imagine biting Carter.
I've always thought it was interesting that parents thought an effective way to teach their child not to hit was to spank them.
Post a Comment